<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><!-- generator=Zoho Sites --><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><atom:link href="https://www.ecsourcemart.com/blogs/capacitor/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title>EC Source Mart - Market Guru , Capacitor</title><description>EC Source Mart - Market Guru , Capacitor</description><link>https://www.ecsourcemart.com/blogs/capacitor</link><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 04:04:26 -0700</lastBuildDate><generator>http://zoho.com/sites/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Can I use 160v 47microfarad capacitor to replace 100v 47microfarad capacitor?]]></title><link>https://www.ecsourcemart.com/blogs/post/Can-I-use-160v-47microfarad-capacitor-to-replace-100v-47microfarad-capacitor</link><description><![CDATA[A 160V capacitor is able to replace a 100V capacitor in most cases, so long at the voltage rating of the capacitor is higher than that of the circuit ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div
 data-element-id="elm_z0zTrqPfQSyu4vHyNNzjIA" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer"><div
 data-element-id="elm_lxskqVhxQeej51_9Yeclcg" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zpalign-items- zpjustify-content- "><style type="text/css"></style><div
 data-element-id="elm_oySfaQ2VRxuwPPzGARMNhw" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_JZYPWoCVRU6X0rfvT47afw" data-element-type="codeSnippet" class="zpelement zpelem-codesnippet "><div class="zpsnippet-container"><p><a><img class="profile_photo_img" src="https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-thumb-119804935-200-fyhjguofejwhzssptyepjcgjpzasjptn.jpeg"></a><a class="user" href="/profile/Ian-Goegebuer" action_mousedown="UserLinkClickthrough" id="__w2_HZsnMKy_name_link">Ian Goegebuer</a></P><p>Ian Goegebuer, B.S. Computer Engineering & Computer Science, California State University, Long Beach (2015)</p></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_UV6FpjaJS1eS24cicwNiOg" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align- " data-editor="true"><div><p><span></span></p><div class="u-serif-font-main--regular"><div class="ui_qtext_expanded"><span><p class="ui_qtext_para">A 160V capacitor is able to replace a 100V capacitor in most cases, so long at the voltage rating of the capacitor is higher than that of the circuit and the two capacitors are of the same type. That being said, a 160v 47microfarad is designed to be 47microfarad at 160V and lower voltages <b>MAY</b> change its actual capacitance. So if the circuit calls for a 100V capacitor, it is ideal to stick to that, but it will likely work with a higher rating.</p><p class="ui_qtext_para">Cases where a minor change in capacitance might be an issue:</p><ul><li>RF Applications</li><li>Timing applications</li><li>Audio applications (on signal side)</li><li>Signal processing</li></ul><p class="ui_qtext_para">Places where a minor change in capacitance is likely a non-issue:</p><ul><li>Power regulation</li><li>Power filtering</li><li>Ripple prevention</li></ul><p class="ui_qtext_para">In short, if the capacitor is used as a “battery” the circuit will likely be unaffected by the change, but if the capacitor is used for filtering with timing based upon its capacitance the circuit may be affected by the change.</p></span></div></div><p></p></div></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div> ]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:31:16 +0530</pubDate></item></channel></rss>